7/30/09

Were not in Dallas anymore!


The Cotton Bowl has officially left Dallas, TX behind and has moved into Arlington, TX.

LINK

Personally, I can't stand it! I am a traditionalist and really liked the old stadium. Sure, it was not a fancy place, but it was "tradition." It was a piece of College Football History! I am glad that I went to the 2005 Cotton Bowl (among many others), as I won't get that opportunity again.

It is for this same reason that I traveled to Miami in 2007 to see Miami play in the original Orange Bowl. I just had to see it before it was gone!

Southwest Classic Logo



The logo for the game between Arkansas and Texas A&M has been released. Opinions about the logo seem to be all over the map, as some hate it and others like it.

Personally, I am one that likes to see things like this "grow" naturally from a rivalry game that is played over a period of time. However, I have to say that I actually think this logo is pretty sharp.

One thing that I would have done to make the logo better is that I would have left the team logos off. I would have made the logo about the game, and not necessarily the two teams.

For example, when someone says "Red River Shoot-Out," you automatically think of the Longhorns and Sooners. You don't need to see a logo that shows both of the teams who are playing in that game, because you know exactly who plays in the "Red River Shoot-Out."

I would like for this game to carry the same weight, however, I understand that it is not on the level as the game between Texas and Oklahoma. Who knows, maybe it can get there!? With enough money, anything is possible.

Statistical Greatness!

You need to go to www.CollegeGameBalls.com and check out the Statistical Break-Down they created in order to determine the best teams of the last five years.

There are a lot of ways to create a list like this, but this is one of the better ways to do it (in my opinion).

List of Top Teams over the past 5 seasons!

6/30/09

Best fans? Texting for Trouble?

So after reading this article, my first question was..."I thought Nebraska fans were suppose to be the greatest anywhere?"

Did the Nebraska Ath. Dept. not realize that this was going to be taken negatively by a lot of people? What a great way to shoot your own reputation in the foot!

It also may offer a better opportunity for fans to report another fan without anyone knowing.

“If they’re sitting there taking abuse or listening to someone speaking inappropriately or having some inappropriate conduct, they can report that almost anonymously,” Yardley said.


I hope they define "inappropriate" in a way that everyone understands. If not, I suspect a lot of people will get turned in for just "being a little annoying."

While I too want those who annoy me to simply go away, I am not sure that I should be able to report "annoying" behavior to the police. After all, isn't that "subjective?"

My second question was; if you are sitting there and the cops come up and arrest (?) you. Do you have a chance to rebut the accusation?

I guess we will just have to see how this plays out.

If you want to read more, check out HuskerExtra.com or Omaha.com and TheWizofOdds.com


This new "texting" feature at Nebraska (and Florida has it as well), reminds me of another campaign that the University of Texas started a few years ago. The same (or similar) campaign started at Ohio State first, but then Texas decided to run with it shortly after.


UT announces good-sportsmanship campaign
By John Maher | Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 01:22 PM

The University of Texas kicked off a campaign to promote good sportsmanship among fans Tuesday. The theme, which fans will soon be seeing on everything from T-shirts and cups to messages on the giant new scoreboard is: “Texas Fans Make Us Proud.”

Respectful, friendly and passionate will also be part of the message.

The campaign is the result of project started by the Texas Exes a year ago that included students, alumni, spirit groups and administrators. UT administrators said that the football team’s national championship last year will only magnify the spotlight on the team and fan behavior. They are also very aware that Ohio State fans will be coming to town for a Sept. 9 game and do not want a repeat of some of the behavior Longhorn fans encountered in Columbus.

UT fans will be urged to monitor their alcohol consumption, treat opposing teams and fans with respect, watch their language, tell ushers if they see inappropriate behavior and support the team enthusiastically.


Are Longhorn fans really that bad that they need a campaign such as this? I mean, if I didn't know how bad Texas Fans really were, then I guess its nice that their Ath. Dept. has taken it upon themselves to let me know in advance.

After all, what other message is this suppose to send??

6/27/09

Excitement in Ohio


This is my "random" post of the day (I guess). I am thinking that if Ohio State can't get it done with Tyrell Pryor at the helm, then I am not sure what it is they are missing.

In other words, I think Pryor is the guy Ohio State has been looking for. In 2009, I am predicting that he will be that break-out player that has all the skills and speed to get Ohio State back into the spotlight, and to do it in a good way.

He has the potential to "wow" a lot of watchers, fans, and voters, and there will be plenty of recruits (who have speed) who will want to play at Ohio State because of him. Speed has been, arguably, the one thing that has kept Ohio State from getting over the BCS National Title Game "Bump."

Whether it really was or not, I think Pryor will the guy that solves that problem for the Buckeyes.

TexAgs.com in the NYTimes.com!

As many visitors of this blog know, I attended Texas A&M University. Therefore, if I am online, I am usually on TexAgs.com reading threads, posting, etc. Anyway, I thought it was great that TexAgs.com got a "plug" in the New York Times, so I have posted it here.

The second article is one from two years ago. I think I posted it before but I figured I would re-post it again.

However, another reason I posted this is because I am very "beside myself" with where A&M's program currently is. I mean, here I am reading the NY Times, and they have A&M at No. 72 of 120 Teams. There are a lot of reasons why teams such as Oklahoma, Texas, and LSU are doing very well and why A&M is not. These teams are all in the same region and I guess something has to "give." Unfortunately, what has "given" is apparently A&M's football program.

On the other hand, if TCU, Baylor, and Oklahoma State can continue to "grow" as programs, there is no reason that A&M shouldn't be doing better (instantly)!

In the first article (below) they have listed the A&M schedule for 2009. I have highlighted the teams in BLUE that I think A&M will beat this season. However, I have highlighted in RED the teams that are most likely (at least on paper) to be a loss. Finally, the teams in GREEN are the ones that I either have no idea, or are a toss-up. According to this...it doesn't look great, as my colors has A&M at 4-6-2 (2 being the 2 in green).

On the other hand, I think Sherman is the guy who will at least get A&M back to a consistent 8 wins per season. I don't know if that will happen in 2009, and I don't think it is likely, but then again, I really really really hope I am wrong.



June 21, 2009, 12:17 pm — (Updated: 1:24 pm)
The Quad Countdown: No. 72 Texas A&M
By Paul Myerberg

What I predicted in last year’s preview: Looking at the Big 12 schedule, I see four wins in Kansas State, Iowa State, Colorado at home and Baylor. The other four are toss-ups, especially as A&M needs to go to Oklahoma State and Texas. What about the defense, you might ask? It is an area of concern, no question about it – but I see an improvement under Joe Kines, who has made a living out of creating top 10 defenses, especially against the pass. Over all, I expect an 8-4 season from A&M. I know many are projecting the Aggies to hover around .500, but I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt.

Postseason re-ranking: No. 84.

2008 record and recap: (4-8, 2-6). Horrible, simply horrible. Could Mike Sherman’s first season back with Texas A&M have gone any worse? Yes, it actually could have. A&M’s four wins came by a total of 31 points, including narrow victories in nonconference play over New Mexico and Army. The Aggies even lost their home opener – to Arkansas State – for the first time in 20 years, perhaps a harbinger of the setbacks yet to come. Texas A&M allowed at least 41 points in seven of its losses, including an embarrassing three-game stretch to end the season in which the Aggies were outscored, 156-58. Among those final three games? A humiliating 41-21 loss at Baylor, which all but assured A&M’s first winless season in South division play since the conference’s formation. All told, the 2008 season greatly resembled Dennis Franchione’s first season, 2003, when the Aggies also finished 4-8. Though the 2003 team may have been worse defensively, if that’s possible, it did do two things last year’s Aggies could not: beat Arkansas State and Baylor. Suffice to say, there are many questions regarding the future of this program. Maybe I shouldn’t give them “the benefit of the doubt” in 2009?

High point: Texas A&M went 2-1 against the Big 12 North, with wins coming by 49-35 at Iowa State and by 24-17 over Colorado. Four wins on the season, and only was actually worth writing home about. (If beating a 5-7 Colorado team is cause for celebration.)

Low point: The hits just kept on coming for Sherman and the Aggies, starting with the humbling loss to A.S.U. in the season opener. The trend continued with knee-to-the-groin losses to Oklahoma State (56-28), Kansas State (44-30), Oklahoma (66-28), Baylor and Texas (49-9).

Tidbit: A&M’s 40-points loss to rival Texas was the program’s second-largest margin of defeat in the series, trailing only a 48-0 loss in 1898. A&M has recently experienced a measure of success in the series, in which Texas holds a commanding 74-36-5 advantage (two straight wins, 2006-7); however, it would take A&M’s combined margin from its last five victories over the Longhorns (1994, 1997, 1999, 2006-7) to better to the 40-point margin of a season ago.

Tidbit (U.T. edition): Or T.U., standing for “Texas University,” as A&M often refers to the rival Longhorns. The relationship between the two colleges, contentious on its best day, can be summed up in A&M’s fight song, the Aggie War Hymn. The song has 23 lines, 13 of which (by my count) reference their neighbors in Austin. For example, the War Hymn (sung to the tune of “Goodbye, My Coney Island Baby”) starts “Goodbye to Texas University,” and continues with lines like “the eyes of Texas are upon you/That is the song they sing so well/Sounds Like Hell/So goodbye to Texas University/We’re going to beat you all to…”

Of course, the final stanza is great fun, as Aggie fans repeat “Saw varsity’s horns off” while locking arms and swaying in unison, replicating the motion of a blade. I shiver at the thought of what a group of Aggie students would do to Bevo if they ever got their hands on him.

Former players in the N.F.L.: 29 – DT Michael Bennett (Seattle Seahawks), TE Martellus Bennett (Dallas Cowboys), DT Rocky Bernard (Giants), P Justin Brantly (Houston Texans), DT Red Bryant (Seattle Seahawks), CB Melvin Bullitt (Indianapolis Colts), TE Dan Campbell (New Orleans Saints), WR Jason Carter (Carolina Panthers), OT Corey Clark (San Diego Chargers), DT Ron Edwards (Kansas City Chiefs), CB Aaron Glenn (New Orleans Saints), WR Dante Hall (St. Louis Rams), C Geoff Hangartner (Buffalo Bills), LB Chris Harrington (Cincinnati Bengals), DT Johnny Jolly (Green Bay Packers), P Shane Lechler (Oakland Raiders), QB Stephen McGee (Dallas Cowboys), C Seth McKinney (Buffalo Bills), C Steve McKinney (Seattle Seahawks), DE Mike Montgomery (Green Bay Packers), C Don Muhlbach (Detroit Lions), DT Cyril Obiozor (Green Bay Packers), C Cody Wallace (San Francisco 49ers), DE Ty Warren (New England Patriots), CB Jason Webster (New England Patriots), DT Pat Williams (Minnesota Vikings), OG Billy Yates (New England Patriots).

Top five N.F.L. players from Texas A&M: I had been looking forward to this list for a while now because I really didn’t know what I was going to get from A&M. What do the Aggies have? One of the greats in Yale Lary, a memorable cornerback in Lester Hayes and a former M.V.P. in Moseley. Just missing the cut: linebackers Lee Roy Caffey and Jack Pardee and defensive end Jacob Green, among others.

This is a top-10 list so far, but not in the Countdown’s top three.
1. S Yale Lary (Detroit; 1952-64)
2. CB Lester Hayes (Oakland; 1977-86)
3. RB John David Crow (Chicago, St. Louis, S.F.; 1958-68)
4. DT Ray Childress (Houston, Dallas; 1985-96)
5. K Mark Moseley (Phi., Houston, Wash., Cleveland; 1970-86)

Team

Conference: Big 12, South division.

Head coach: Mike Sherman (’78 Central Connecticut State), 4-8 after one season with the Aggies. Could his first season have gone any worse? No, probably not. Should fans keep the faith? In Sherman’s favor, he is no stranger to the Aggie program, having served two separate stints as R.C. Slocum’s offensive line coach (1989-93, 1995-96). As stated in last year’s preview, most coaches need a year to acclimate themselves to a new program, so Sherman entered last fall with a leg up over any other candidate A&M could have considered. Not that it did him much good. Still, the speed with which Texas A&M went after Sherman – he was hired three days after the besieged Dennis Franchione resigned – signals the faith the university’s administration has in his ability to turn the program around. That optimism has surely been tested after last fall.

Sherman’s impressive resume includes 12 seasons in the N.F.L. as an assistant, a head coach and an executive. His professional career started with a two-year stint as a Packers assistant (1997-98, tight ends/assistant offensive line) under Mike Holmgren, which was followed by one season as the Seahawks offensive coordinator, again under Holmgren. Green Bay, reeling from an 8-8 season under Ray Rhodes, tabbed Sherman as its head coach before the 2000 season, a position he held through 2005. Sherman had a six-year record of 59-43, though that was hampered by a 4-12 season in 2005; through five years, Sherman’s .640 winning percentage was second in Packers history to Vince Lombardi. His 59 wins represent the fourth-most in Packers history. Sherman held an executive post in the Packers front office each of his six seasons, including, like his professional mentor Holmgren, being general manager from 2001 to 2004. He was fired after the 2005 season, then moved to Houston, where he was the Texans assistant head coach from 2006 to 2007.

Returning starters: 13 (7 offense, 6 defense).

Key losses: The Aggies must replace the heart of their running game, though neither Mike Goodson nor Jorvorskie Lane performed to their lofty standards in 2008. Lane, despite being undervalued, underused and often injured as a senior (93 yards and 5 scores), finished his Aggie career as the program’s career leader in rushing touchdowns (49), total scores (50) and had the most career points by a non-kicker (302). From his freshman through junior seasons, Lane never once dipped below 119 carries, 595 yards or 9 touchdowns in a season; in 2006 and 2007, he combined for 1,505 yards and 35 rushing touchdowns. Last fall, though admittedly stymied by injuries, Lane only twice had more than five carries in a game (seven against New Mexico and Army). The outside runner to Lane’s bruising style was Mike Goodson, the team’s leading rusher in 2006 (847 yards) and 2008 (406).

Like Lane, Goodson’s worst season of his career came last fall, when he received more than eight carries in a game only three times. After posting only 38 yards in the team’s final six games – two of which he missed to injury – Goodson wisely opted to enter the N.F.L. draft, forgoing his final year of eligibility. An early-season injury cost quarterback Stephen McGee the starting job he had held the previous two seasons, and he threw for only 586 yards in his final season. His legacy at A&M, one reinforced by top-five career rankings in completion percentage (59.5), total offense (7,225 yards) and passing yards (5,475), was secured by back-to-back victories over rival Texas (2006-7). It may be true, as Texas Tech’s Mike Leach proposed this off-season, that the Cowboys – the team that drafted McGee in the fourth round of April’s draft – like McGee more than Sherman did. Still, McGee’s limited senior season does not diminish his solid Aggies career.

Defensively, the Aggies lost both starting ends, Michael Bennett and Cyril Obiozor. In his first season as a starter, Bennett led all Aggies with 12 tackles for loss (adding two sacks and an interception). Obiozor, a two-year starter and a three-year contributor up front, led all A&M defensive linemen in tackles (45) and sacks (3) for the second straight season. Alton Dixon set a career high in tackles as a senior (94), when the coaching staff used him at the rover spot and at outside linebacker. The losses in the secondary continued with the graduation of cornerbacks Arkeith Brown (50 tackles, 1 interception) and Danny Gorrer and rover Devin Gregg (37 tackles). Gregg, whose 33 career starts at the end of the 2008 season led the team, moved back into the starting lineup when Dixon transitioned down to linebacker. In the kicking game, the Aggies lost perhaps the second-best punter in team history in Justin Brantly, who trails only the former Aggie great Shane Lechler in career punt average (44.4 yards) and career net average (39.9 yards).

Players to watch: Despite being thrown into the fire early into the 2008 season, the junior quarterback Jerrod Johnson responded with one of the best passing seasons in A&M history. On the year, Johnson threw for 2,435 yards (fifth on the team’s single-season list) and 21 touchdowns (a team record) while completing 59.5 percent of his passes (sixth in program history). Johnson started 10 games, sitting out the season opener and backing up McGee in the finale at Texas, setting a team record for passing yards in a game (419 against Kansas State) along the way. He did lose some of his effectiveness down the stretch, throwing 6 of his 10 interceptions against Oklahoma and Baylor, but Johnson showed himself to be a good fit for Sherman’s offense, and a piece on which to build the rest of the offense around. Not that his starting job is completely secure: Johnson will have to hold off the sophomore Ryan Tannehill, a record-setting receiver for the Aggies who aspires to return to his former position. Last fall, Tannehill set team freshman records for receptions (55) and yards (844); the Aggies would be better off keeping him at receiver. Tannehill teams with his electric fellow sophomore Jeff Fuller (50 receptions for 630 yards and an A&M freshman record 9 touchdown grabs) to give the Aggies one of the best young receiver tandems in the F.B.S. Fuller looks like a future N.F.L. draft pick. Rounding out a stellar receiving corps is the junior tight end Jamie McCoy, who finished third on the team with 43 receptions for 500 yards last fall, and McCoy’s younger brother, Terrence, a sophomore, who added 24 receptions for 237 yards.

Though four starters return up front, this unit needs to greatly improve in pass protection. Leading the way is the senior left tackle Michael Shumard, who will moved inside from left tackle to guard, and the senior center Kevin Matthews, a member of the 2009 Rimington Trophy watch list. Injuries decimated this group in the spring, so it will be important to get the returning starters as many snaps as possible in fall practice to prepare them for the season opener. Call me crazy, but I like this Aggie defense. Any improvement from this side of the ball will be a result of improved play from the line, which must replace both its starting ends. One end spot – the “jack” position in Joe Kines’s defense – will be filled by the athletic junior Von Miller, who the team moved down from outside linebacker. Though undersized, Miller showed his pass-rushing ability last fall, when he led the team with 3.5 sacks. I’m excited to see what he can do coming off the edge. The senior Matt Featherston, the team’s co-leading tackler last fall, will also get a good look at the jack spot.

The interior of the line will be manned by the talented sophomore Eddie Brown and Tony Jerod-Eddie, each of whom got their feet wet as part of the line rotation last fall. The secondary, not altogether terrible last fall, brings back the senior Jordan Pugh and the sophomore Trent Hunter at safety. Pugh (45 tackles, 1 interception) moves back to safety after starting at corner last fall. The second-year player Justin McQueen is penciled in at cornerback, as is fellow sophomore Terrence Frederick, who started six games as the team’s nickelback in 2008. The defensive backfield could be very good, but it will need strong performances from its underclassmen.

Position battle to watch: The position changes for Featherston and Miller means all three linebacker spots are open. As of now, the team hopes a tide of unproven freshmen and sophomores can step in and provide a boost to last year’s underperforming defense. The best of the bunch is the sophomore Garrick Williams, who posted 36 tackles and 1.5 sacks in five starts as a rookie. He’ll battle the senior Anthony Lewis for the starting role. Lewis was Featherston’s backup last fall, but seniority should mean little to a coaching staff in desperate need of playmakers. Currently atop the depth chart on the outside are the redshirt freshman Kyle Mangan and the sophomore Ricky Cavanaugh (seven tackles in five games last fall).

Sensing a need for more depth, Sherman and his staff signed five linebackers in the team’s 2009 recruiting class; one, Jonathan Stewart, may be good enough to push his way onto the field as a true freshman. Another position battle to watch is at running back, where the favorite to supplant Goodson is the sophomore Cyrus Gray (363 yards rushing). The sophomore Bradley Stephens is also in competition for the top job, but keep an eye out for the incoming freshman Christine Michael, one of the top high school running backs in the 2009 class and one of the highest-ranked recruits in recent A&M history.

2009 schedule:
Sept. 5 New Mexico
Sept. 19 Utah State
Sept. 26 U.A.B.
Oct. 3 Arkansas (in Dallas)
Oct. 10 Oklahoma State
Oct. 17 @ Kansas State
Oct. 24 @Texas Tech
Oct. 31 Iowa State
Nov. 7 @ Colorado
Nov. 14 @ Oklahoma
Nov. 21 Baylor
Nov. 26 Texas

Game(s) to watch: In nonconference play, A&M meets its old SWC rival Arkansas for the first time since 1991. The two teams will meet every year through 2018, with the potential to extend the series even further. The Countdown is excited. In the Big 12, Aggie Nation always circles Texas as the game of the year, but the more important game in 2009 is Baylor, as that game will decide who finishes last in the South.

Season breakdown & prediction: Regardless of how poorly equipped Sherman may be to handle this job, or how inept the defense was a season ago, the Aggies should be able to roll out of bed and reach six wins this fall. Why? A 3-0 start should be a guarantee, for starters, despite last fall’s slip-up to Arkansas State. From there, Arkansas may be a toss-up, but A&M will have momentum and probably a pro-Aggie crowd in its favor. Let’s say, for argument’s sake, the Aggies lose to the Razorbacks, leaving them 3-1 as it enters Big 12 play. I give the team one win over Iowa State, one out of Kansas State and Colorado, and a third win over Baylor. Yes, the Baylor team that pushed the Aggies around a season ago. But this game is in College Station, where the Bears haven’t won since 1984. So that’s my prediction: 6-6, but no better. One thing is clear: A&M is as far off the two big dogs – Oklahoma and Texas – as it has been in some time.

Dream season: The tide turns in one season: 10-2, 6-2 in the Big 12, with wins over Baylor and Texas.

Nightmare season: It may not represent a worse record than last fall, but another 4-8 season and last-place finish in the South would be disastrous.

Where Texas A&M fans congregate: As one would expect with a bigger program, the independent sites are coming fast and furious: the best is TexAgs.com, but don’t forget about AgTimes.com and AggiesFans.com. For recruiting news, visit AggieYell.com and AggieWebsider.com.

Who is No. 71?: The next time you visit this university, impress the locals by ordering a loco moco at any of the area’s many, many roadside eateries. If you’re like me, you order the loco moco with teriyaki chicken, and don’t skimp on that macaroni salad.

An earlier version misstated one of the years of Texas A&M’s last five victories over Texas.





SPORTS OF THE TIMES; Internet Whistleblowers Go Where N.C.A.A. Fears to Tread
By SELENA ROBERTS
Published: July 15, 2007


Photo: A Sense of Community The third Madison Square Garden, on Eighth Avenue between 49th and 50th Streets, with Nedick's next door. George Vecsey, Page 7. (Photograph by The New York Times, 1957)

The Buddy List of watchdogs for college sports operates under pseudonyms inside a message-board world that functions as group therapy for cathartic enthusiasts.

In technology speak, call them iFans. They descend upon wildly popular Web sites like TexAgs.com with their team musings and debates and, at times, the kind of insider information that can doom a rival to N.C.A.A. purgatory.

It was well past midnight in January 2006 when a user named aggiegrant06 dashed off a thread on TexAgs.com that detailed how his girlfriend handed out payroll checks for a car dealer in Norman, Okla. ''She didn't recognize several of the names,'' aggiegrant06 wrote. ''She thought it was fishy and asked me.''

The boyfriend knew the names in the blink of an instant message: They were football players at Oklahoma. Gotcha, Rhett Bomar. Six months later, after it was determined that Bomar, the Sooners' sainted quarterback, received money for a no-show job at Big Red Sports/Imports, Coach Bob Stoops tossed him from the team.

Last week, the N.C.A.A., citing Oklahoma's failure to monitor the employment of its players, handed down punishment, forcing the team to erase its victories from the 2005 season. Oklahoma will appeal.

Aggiegrant06 wasn't a spy hidden in the bushes, but a chat-room visitor who lurked among hard drives. He was a legitimate tipster, even though his postings on TexAgs.com were pulled by the administrator within two hours because the information lacked sufficient evidence.
How can a fan-site monitor measure Internet cred?

''We're in a strange situation,'' said Brandon Jones, the vigilant owner of TexAgs.com, a fan site independent of Texas A&M. ''We function as editors in trying to determine if something is valid.
''But you'd be surprised. It's rare when we see something that is blatantly dishonest.''

The iFan, armed with a BlackBerry or an iPhone, a cellphone camera or a text message, is actually better equipped to be a caretaker of college athletics than the sleuths at the N.C.A.A., whose water guns and magnifying glasses leave them best suited to guard a tip jar.

Exactly when is the N.C.A.A.'s investigation of Reggie Bush's luxury family digs while he was a star at the University of Southern California going to conclude?

The iFan, as an embedded member of the fight-song culture, can be considered more diligent in the oversight of a program than serially incurious university compliance officers who ignore the sudden appearance of Cadillac Escalades in the player parking lot.

Those earnest university officials don't self-police, they self-protect. The disingenuousness of authority figures on campus leaves those searching for real answers to try an alternate route that, in essence, violates the core tenet of childhood: go ahead, trust a stranger.

An anonymous post on a bulletin board can possess as much veracity as the selective account of an athletic department curator.

''What's interesting to me, and I've owned and operated this site since 1999, is that there is definitely a change in how the site is received,'' Jones said. ''And I'd say it was about three years ago when we started to cross into a realm of legitimacy.''

It was cyberfans, after all, who uncovered the kegger night indulgences of Larry Eustachy at Iowa State and ratted out Rick Neuheisel's dalliance in a March Madness pool at the University of Washington.

Team spirit has never been so deliciously interactive. How else would we know if Nick Saban had cozy conversations with prospects this spring -- a potential N.C.A.A. infraction for Alabama's newest Bear Bryant knockoff -- if not for a Miami Hurricanes fan site, canesport.com.

''I think it's funny it came from Miami,'' Saban recently told reporters.

An agenda might make a posting suspicious, but not necessarily bogus.

Internet meddlers aren't Web surfers without a day job killing time in their bathrobes anymore.

There are more than 200,000 unique visitors to TexAgs.com each month in what amounts to a survey of every demographic on subjects from the popularity of team uniforms to the unpopularity of a coach.

Fan sites are where athletic directors and coaches, boosters and players go to be in the know anonymously.

''It's the great equalizer,'' Jones said. ''No one knows who you are, whether you're wealthy or famous. Everyone is the person next door.''

The neighborhood is eclectic. Before Robert Gates took office as the nation's secretary of defense in 2006, he was the president at Texas A&M. People knew exactly who he was -- or did they?

On TexAgs.com, he blended into the fan forum with a secret identity: ranger65, according to The Dallas Morning News. Gates often began his posts with ''I'm told'' as he went into different issues with Aggies devotees.

Not everyone in a chat room is such an impeccable source of information. But more and more, the message board has become a place where news isn't made up, but made.

''It's a paradigm shift in how information is disseminated,'' Jones said. ''Our viewership continues to increase each year. People everywhere have become citizen reporters.''

Whistleblowers of the iFan crowd are now equipped to investigate what the N.C.A.A. can't -- or won't.

E-mail: selenasports@nytimes.com

6/26/09

The Trophy Case

I don't get a chance to update my "virtual trophy case" very often, but when I do, I try to post the updates here.

Right now the blog/trophy case focuses exclusively on football trophies and rings from Texas A&M University. However, if (and when) I get all of them posted, I am plan on expanding the display to select trophies and rings from other schools as well.

In the mean time, enjoy!

Click here to view:
CAMPUSOLOGY





6/20/09

Univ. of Kentucky Basketball Decisions

I know that I don't normally write basketball opinions such as this one, however, after reading all that is going on over at the University of Kentucky, I just couldn't help myself. I am not claiming that all of this is accurate or even that I am right. All I am trying to communicate here is that everything Kentucky did and said during the Gillispie hire/fire, followed by the Calipari hiring....well, it has me questioning what the people in Kentucky are really thinking.

Article Link

Impatient for a winner, Kentucky fired Gillispie after just two years, too many losses and too little appreciation for all the things that come with running college basketball's all-time winningest program. Saying the Wildcats deserve a leader who understands "this is not just another coaching job," athletic director Mitch Barnhart and president Lee Todd made the unusual decision to dismiss Gillispie less than two years after he was hired to replace Tubby Smith.

"He's a good basketball coach," Barnhart said. "Sometimes it's just not the right fit and that's my responsibility."

It's a move Barnhart felt was necessary following a couple of turbulent seasons in which the Wildcats struggled to improve under their hard-working but sometimes aloof head coach.

Barnhart said rebuilding years are expected when a new coach is hired. The trouble were "philosophical differences" between the university and Gillispie on the role the school's coach plays...."There is a clear difference in how the rules and responsibilities of overseeing the program are viewed," Barnhart said. "It is a gap that I do not believe can be solved just by winning games. It is a philosophical disparity that I do not think can be repaired when the chemistry is just not right."

Forget about Coach G. for a second and just evaluate UK's BBall Program and the "reasons" they give for making such hiring/firing decicisons.

Is Barnhart refering too "cheating," when he speaks about "philosophical differences" and "too little appreciation" for what it takes to run a big-time college program? I would hope not, but it almost seems like he is saying that what Gillispie did was not good enough, and yet what Calipari has been accused of doing in his prior coaching stops is apparently acceptable.


[Gillispie] could be gruff with the media and stubbornly refused to change his coaching strategy even as the program suffered embarrassing losses to schools like Gardner-Webb and VMI.

Barnhart said the problem wasn't Gillispie's won-loss record but his seeming refusal to do the other things associated with being the head coach at the state's flagship institution.

"(Gillispie) spoke to things that were not in his job description, just about winning and losing and improving," Barnhart said. "This program is bigger than that. There's much more to it than that."

Are we talking about "cheating" again? I know that everyone said it was really about how tough Gillispie was in practice (esp. on gamedays), but maybe it was a different "strategy" that Barnhart is referring too (?).


Gillispie arrived at Kentucky with great fanfare to replace Smith two years ago. Hundreds of supporters crowded the floor of Memorial Coliseum during a pep rally -- one with a sign that read "Billy G: Our Savior!"

The coach who engineered turnarounds at UTEP and Texas A&M was heralded by one of college basketball's most ardent fan bases, who were won over by Gillispie's notorious work ethic and homespun demeanor.

The losses and Gillispie's somewhat sarcastic demeanor prevented him from connecting with some of the 20,000-plus assistant coaches who packed Rupp Arena every fall,
some of whom waited anxiously next to a radio table following home games hoping to get a glimpse, a handshake or an autograph from the state's highest paid and mostly highly visible employee.

It's amazing how fast a fan base can turn on you. I mean, without really knowing who you are, they act as if you are some how connected by the same thread. They (the fans) honestly think you (the coach) really love their school as much as they do, and for the same reasons.

Regardless, the same "demeanor" that they fell in love with is the same "demeanor" that they used as an excuse to run him off.


He claimed he wasn't hired to be a celebrity, but to win games. He struggled at both, at least by Kentucky standards.

This is probably the most accurate statement concerning the whole affair. He wasn't hired to be a celebrity, he was hired to win games (which he didn't do enough of). Had he been winning enough games, they would have gladly overlooked any other "short-coming" he may have had.

So why is all this relevant?

Well, its relevant because Kentucky recently found out that their new hire (John Calipari) left his last job at UMass with plenty of NCAA violations to go around.


John Calipari used to coach at UMass. In 1996, Calipari he guided UMass to the Final Four. You won't find evidence of that in the NCAA record book, however, because Marcus Camby was on the take. - Article Link



John Calipari said that his decision to leave UMass for the Nets had nothing to do with recent allegations that star center Marcus Camby had received money and gifts from two agents while he was still playing collegiately.

Camby reportedly has admitted taking improper gifts from would-be sports agents, and Connecticut prosecutors are investigating whether an unsuccessful agent tried to blackmail Camby into signing with him. - Article Link

Oh...wait...the UMass "scandal" was from 1996 before Calipari was at Memphis. I meant his "last job" as in the Univ. of Memphis. [/sarcasm]


Article Link - The NCAA notified the University of Memphis that its men's basketball program has been charged with major violations during the 2007-08 season under former head coach John Calipari.

The allegations include "knowing fraudulence or misconduct" on an SAT exam taken by a player from that 2007-08 team.

Should that allegation prove to be true, the program may be forced to forfeit its NCAA-record 38 victories and Final Four appearance, which culminated in a loss in the title game to Kansas.

In addition, it is alleged that the school provided almost $2,300 in free transportation to an associate of an unnamed player.

I guess some at Kentucky might say "so what?" Well, here is the "what" part of that answer.


Article Link - The Memphis investigation could have far-reaching consequences at Kentucky. Rest assured, the NCAA will take a much closer look at the Wildcats' three prized recruits - point guard John Wall, forward DeMarcus Cousins and point guard Eric Bledsoe - who are all still trying to qualify academically.

It probably doesn't help that Wall pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for walking into a vacant house in Raleigh, N.C., and entered a program for first offenders that requires him to complete 75 hours of community service and stay out of trouble for the next six months.

So, is this what Barnhart really meant when he said that both he (and UK) had "Philosophical Differences" with Coach BCG?

If so, then I guess Calipari shares those "Philosophical Ideas." (?)

Is this kind of "baggage" acceptable if you are pulling in the right amount of wins each season? Apparently so.

I know that some at Kentucky (including Barnhart) have at least alluded to the fact that BCG's personal life as well as his interaction with fans and media were part of the equation. However, when BCG was at Texas A&M (and winning) no one had any real problems with him (fans and media alike). At least not the type of problems that would get someone fired, because that is what winning does.

One can only conclude that at a program like Kentucky, everything negative about Calipari can be overlooked if he wins enough (and the same would have been true about BCG).

Finally....


Article Link - University of Kentucky President Lee T. Todd Jr. said basketball coach John Calipari told him during the coach’s job interview about the NCAA investigation of allegations of major rule violations at the University of Memphis.

Todd said university officials were confident that Calipari, who isn’t named in the NCAA investigation report, did not do anything wrong while leading the University of Memphis team.

Well, of course they are!!

What is President Todd suppose to say? "He told us and now we are going to fire him."..?

Or, "We think he didnt do anything wrong, because we (Kentucky) don't really have a problem with the things that allegedly went on at Memphis...especially if it helps us get to the National Title game!"..?

He might as well of said the latter.

At the end of the day, Aggies have mixed emotions about coach Gillispie. However, all of that is unimportant right now. This is about the Univ. of Kentucky trying to act like they had no idea what they were getting into when they hired Coach Gillispie.

However, if that is true, UK needs to get a "more informed" search committee for its head coaches. Also, the fan base needs to start questioning the Ath. Dept's. hiring methods. Could you imagine if you school hired a coach that turned out to be someone you didn't want (for whatever reason); only for the AD to turn around and say..."Well, I didn't really know what I was getting into when I hired that guy!"

My first question would be "Well why not!?"

Either way, now UK has hired Calipari. Regardless of how he is doing it, Calipari knows how to win games (obviously). The only problem is that once again, UK has hired someone that appears to be carrying some of the similar baggage that UK has already said it doesn't want.

Or, is it that the baggage is perfectly acceptable as long as you win!? Maybe this is what is meant by "Univ. of Kentucky Standards."




6/15/09

The Cost of Recruiting!

If you haven't already seen this, then you are missing out. Okay, you may think this is boring stuff, but I found it pretty interesting.

There is an amazing amount of information contained in this article that covers all the costs associated with the Univ. of Tennessee's 2009 Recruiting class.

Basically, the class that UT signed in Feb. 2009 cost them a little over $1 Million!

Of that $1 Million, only about $260,000 was spent under Fulmer before he left in November, and then Coach Kiffin spent about $835,000 between Dec. 1 and Feb. 4! Although that is amazing, I am guessing it probably has a lot to do with UT saving the majority of the recruiting budget to be spent after the new coach has come and taken over. If that is the case, then I can't argue with the logic.

Now, lets just see what the return on this $1 Million investment is for UT!

Anyway, here is a link to the article. Enjoy!

Another $1 million signing class; cost of recruiting has UT staying within budget for 2009-10
By Dave Hooker

GoVolsXtra.com

6/9/09

Now that is a rivalry!

Rick Neuheisel tells UCLA boosters he's 'ticked' at USC's Pete Carroll
June 8, 2009
From LATimesBlogs.com


A league rule prohibits anybody younger than 18 from being on the sideline during a football game, so Neuheisel proposed creating a waiver for coaches' children (namely his own). When he brought it up to a committee of his fellow coaches, the vote was overwhelmingly in favor -- by a margin of 9-1.

Was it another case of Pac-10 football boiling down to USC and everybody else?

Neuheisel shared the story during a booster event last month. He recalled looking at the lone dissenter and thinking, "I'm gonna' get you. I'm gonna' reel you in. I don't know how, I don't know when, but I am not going to rest until I reel you in." Then he reminded the crowd, "Now, you noticed I did not name any names, did I?"

But immediately before that, he made it clear whom he was talking about. First acknowledging respect for Pete Carroll, Neuheisel introduced his story by saying, "He did something this last week that ticks me off, and I'm going to share it with you and see if it ticks you off. And we're going to walk out of this room tonight ticked off at Pete Carroll, ticked off at all that is SC."
It's worth nothing that though Neuheisel's kids are all under 18, most if not all of Carroll's are over 18. In fact, son Brennan Carroll is an assistant coach for the Trojans.

Sidelines can be unfriendly places for kids. Heavy equipment is all over the place, and that's not including the 300-pound linemen. Grown men run out of bounds at a full sprint. Carroll once saw one of his own receivers sprain an ankle while avoiding a small child on the sideline of USC's practice field.

Neuheisel is still hoping to be joined by his kids, even if he's not sure what to do with them. He told the crowd that before technology improved, some leagues allowed coaches' children to carry cords around on the sideline. "I kinda always dreamt of a day that my boy would be able to do that. Well, now we don't have cords ... but I'm still going to make my son carry one even though it's not plugged into anything!"

-- Adam Rose
Photos: UCLA's Rick Neuheisel, left, is upset with USC's Pete Carroll, right. Credit: Photographs by Luis Sinco/Los Angeles Times


Some of this was edited out. To read the whole thing, visit here!

6/8/09

Where did all the money go!?

Holding pattern: After a huge financial hit, will OSU’s Athletic Village ever become a reality?
By BILL HAISTEN World Sports Writer
Published: 6/7/2009

STILLWATER By now, when he arrives each morning at his spot in the Oklahoma State coaches' parking lot, Mike Holder expected to see a flurry of construction activity to the immediate north of Boone Pickens Stadium. He expected to see the development of Oklahoma State's Athletic Village a collection of state-of-the-art venues that would include a $50 million indoor practice facility and a $30 million baseball stadium.

Instead, he sees 100 acres of mostly nothing.

Eleven months ago, OSU had $407 million in a facilities fund managed by T. Boone Pickens' BP Capital investment firm.

A few weeks later, because of the stock-market crisis, a lot of that money was gone.

"Things were great from Jan. 1, 2006, until July of 2008, and then we hit a slight bump in the road," Holder says. "We lost ($282 million) in three months.

Read more:

6/6/09

Beary-Expensive!

$225,000 for prime Cal football tickets
Carolyn Jones, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, June 5, 2009

UC Berkeley is serious about mining the gold in the Golden Bears.

As a way to raise money for the renovation of Memorial Stadium, the university is charging some football fans up to $225,000 to see the Bears play.

The program, similar to personal seat license plans used by many professional teams, will require hefty financial commitments from about 3,000 fans whose season tickets are between the 30-yard lines on the west side of the stadium. If they decline to participate, they'll have to give up their seats.

The goal is to increase the school's athletic endowment tenfold, from its current $50 million to at least half a billion dollars over a 30-year period. The money will be used to fund scholarships, pay salaries and cover the $250 million price tag to seismically upgrade the crumbling 86-year-old stadium.

"This is an opportunity to renovate the jewel on the hill - Memorial Stadium - and stabilize the financial situation of the athletic department, which has been a problem for decades," said Associate Athletic Director Dave Rosselli.

"We want to solidify the future of the football program because with the money and attention it brings in, it's an engine that catapults philanthropy and morale across the entire athletic department," he said.

Several fans already have sent checks of $900,00, which buys four seats in what the school is calling the University Club. Membership benefits include 50-year rights to your seat including season tickets, on-campus parking on game days, free food and drinks, including beer and wine, cup holders and other perks. A clubhouse also will be available, consisting of a portion of the press box that will include an expansive balcony overlooking the campus and San Francisco Bay.

....

Across the bay at Stanford, there are no personal seat programs, but fans must pay an extra $500 to $2,000 a year to sit between the 45-yard lines.

"They're asking $225,000? And they give us crap for being elitists," Stanford's director of tickets, Rich Muschell, said with a laugh. "How 'bout those Bears."


For more: